Research Presentation Essay

Materialism Jhingur judges himself by the valuate of his property as if this defines his use Quote Whenever Jhingur looked at his cane field a sort of toxic condition came over him. He had bighas of land which would earn him an easy 600 rupees. And if God sawto it that therates went up then who could complain? Why should he worry about bills? The merchants were already beginning to fawn on him. From the beginning we put one acrossm to counselling on the character of Jhingur that exposems to value wealth over what may be for himself and his community. Instead of focusing on how his work can positively imprint his life, he focuses on the negative.His focus is on his need to make gold from his fellow farmers as possible, believing himself to be the better person. Social Issues Explotation some(prenominal) men are propelled into acts of vengeance that it ultimately destroyed both of their fortunes. This derived from a primitive need for the characters to compete against each some other. The material desires at the stop over have blinded them, and they may never see the true value of life. They brought about their own destruction. The core of this story lies a lesson on how philistinism can impair our ability to see what is best for our life.In the full smear during which India evolved from colonial domination to independence, Tagore and Premchand were pioneers in Modern Indian literature. Their literary operatives pioneered tender show ups and the social structure of India that concentrated on the oppressed, human emotions, destruction, oppressiveness of women and life. These authors proved that they can focus on the psychology of the characters instead of social realism. We will explore the context of the stories through the characters journeys and struggles and unlucky consequences in the end.Punishment portrayal of the complex relationships among the members of the Rui family and how tragedy can get the picture into real issues that we ha ve hidden. The day on which our story begins was like this.. That day, Dukhiram and Chidam had been working near the zamindars office. On a sandbank opposite, paddy had ripened. The paddy mandatory to be cut before the sanbank was washed away, tho the village pile were busy either in their own fields or in cutting jute so a messenger came from the office and forcibly meshed the two pals.As the office roof was leaking in places, they also had to ameliorate that and make some new wicker wood panels it had interpreted them every day. (p. 893) Two peasant brothers and their wives share a house together. The short-tempered, sloppy wife, Radha, is killed by her husband, Dukhiram, in a fit of anger for failing to prepare the even out meal. The village chief intrudes on the scene immediately following the murder, and the other brother, Chidam, unintentionally identifies the beautiful wife, Chandara, as the killer.Chidam instructs Chandara to lie to protect her brother-in-law. Now, w e start to see the divison in the male and female hierarchy. Before this revelation, despite their love for each other, Chandara and Chidam had trouble in the relationship. Chandara suspected her husband of infidelity, and began flirting at the lacrimation hole. Chidam then threatened her stating, Ill break every bone in your body (p. 896) and locked her in the house. She escaped to a relatives house, but was persuaded to return only later on Chidam had to surrender to her. (p. 896). When we examine this relationship, it great to point out that Tagore states, It was as hard to restrain his wife as to block a handful of mercury. (p. 896) Chandara has achieved a sort of power by endurance we tend to question where the balance of power lies in this relationship. The chain of events after the murder further explores the complexity in the relationship of Chidam and Chandara. When discussing the murder they rack up that Chidam will save Chandara from execution, if she agrees to his lie.Chidam expects Chandara to relate that her sister-in-law beleaguered her and that Radha was killed in self-defense. After being taken into custody by the police, Chandara defies her husband by telling the police that the attack was unprovoked and puts her own life at risk. She was so angry with him that she refuses to see him before her execution stating, To hell with him. (p. 899). She accepts the punishment for a crime she did non commit in order to punish Chidam. She will not break out him the satisfaction of saving her.Chidam gets her to take the blame for the crime but loses in the end by not getting his wife back. The story is crotchety by telling a story about the complex character of human behavior and the unjust social set up of how women had no social status and importance in a family. Evidence of how the conquering of women is shown when Chidam states, a wife can be replaced but a brother cannot be replaced, (p. 894) clearly points out women are not valued. Tago re touches on women being oppressed and how social injustice was a common thing issue for women in rural Bangladesh during that time.