Eco1102 Assignment 1 David grey Essay - 1239 Words

1. a) i) The content of the table is about Canada’s economic and financial situation divided into four sectors: real sector, fiscal sector, financial sector, and external factor. Each of the four sectors is divided into smaller categories. For example: real sector is divided into national accounts, production index, labor market, prices indices. The other three factors are also divided into smaller categories just like the real sector. In addition, this table has the most recent GDP to show the success of Canada’s economy. The overall goal of the data is to show Canada’s recent economic situation. ii) There are five level one headings in this table, which are: real sector, fiscal sector, financial sector, external sector, and†¦show more content†¦Therefore, $258,459/$1,819,967= 14.20%. 2. The Bank of Canada is interested in core inflation because compared to inflation, core inflation exclude food, energy and those products with a unstable price. Core inflation as a measure of inflation for policy purposes, it measures inflation more precisely. Core inflation represents the long run trend in the price level. Compared to CPI, core inflation is generally lower because it tries to maintain the price as it avoids high inflation and deflation over time. 3. b) i) Inflation rate between Dec. of 2009 and Dec. of 2008. The formula would be: (CPI(2009)/CPI(2008)-1)*100=((115.4/113.9)-1)*100≈1.32% Date CPI Dec-08 113.9 Jan-09 113.7 Feb-09 114.1 Feb-10 115.9 Apr-09 113.7 May-09 114.2 Jun-09 114.7 Jul-09 114.3 Aug-09 114.5 Sep-09 114.6 Oct-09 114.8 Nov-09 115.4 Dec-09 115.4 b) ii) Inflation rate between Dec. 2013 and Dec. 1992. The formula would be: (CPI(2013)/CPI(1992)-1)*100=((123.5/84.7)-1)*100≈45.81% Date CPI Dec-92 84.7 Dec-13 123.5 b) iii) Inflation rate between October 2013 and October 2002. Date CPI Oct-02 101.3 Oct-13 123 The formula would be:(CPI(2013)/CPI(2002)-1)*100=((123/101.3)-1)*100≈21.42% c. In 1981, the inflation rate was the highest, it was about 12.50%. After that, the inflation rate was decreasing and later on its ups and downs. The inflation rate was the lowest in

Is Affiliation with Deviant Peers an Inheritable Trait

Psychology Essay The paper is addressing the theory that suggests that affiliation with deviate peers is inheritable. Phenotypic research has mainly centred on environmental associates of peer deviance. Often, family life is seen to influence the outcome of peer deviance, which are positively linked with child-parent conflict, poor parental discipline and monitoring. Moreover, PD has been associated with community-level and socioeconomic aspects. Youths might also be predisposed to choosing or being chosen by such peer groups. For instance, a longitudinal study has revealed that individual traits are predictive of PD (Tarantino, et al., 2013). A number of studies have researched on the genetic and environmental involvement in deviant peer affiliation and deviant peer traits. Some of the researches have revealed that there are moderate and big genetic effects on peer deviance and peer use of substance. Studies have shown support for both non-shared and shared surrounding influences on peer deviance and use of substance (Tarantino, et al., 2013). There are longitudinal studies on genetic and environmental influences to peer deviance that have shown that there is transformation of the effects with time. Estimating the variance has revealed a stable growth in genetic influence in the late childhood moving to early adulthood, a reduction in shared environmental influences and a relatively steady quantity of non-shared environmental influences (Tarantino, et al.,

Fire Essay free essay sample

Planning process in which there is some strength and weaknesses of the planning process I will list some recommendations that could be applied to the fire department. Strategic planning has a somewhat of a long process that I am going to explain through out this paper in which the fallowing questions will give you a good idea of how that Strategic Planning process works. I’m going to answer this fallowing questions which are â€Å"who are we†, â€Å"why do we exist†, â€Å"where are we going†, â€Å"how will we get there†, what do we hope to accomplish†, â€Å"what are our strengths and weaknesses† and â€Å" what are our opportunities and threats†? These are the main point on how the process of this plan works. To Start it off Strategic Planning starts with there Leaders and the mangers of the organization, they end up facing a lot of difficult challenges, like shifts in values, tax limits, unfunded mandates, all join together to try and a good volatile global economy. One of the reasons why strategic planning is going to be here to stay I because its good management, and the most cost effective or efficient way to do the work will be done and the rational model is depicted. There is lots of purpose and benefits Strategic Planning could help with and some examples are facilitating communication, participation, accommodate divergent interests, values foster wiser, reasonably analytic decisions-making. In which all o this things could help you out well the community to know what’s going on. This establishment of this plan is to state a statement built around the organization mandates. One thing that we need to make clear is what Strategic Planning isn’t. For example it’s not a substitute for leadership, in which leadership is needed to promote, foster, direct and push the process. Its also not a solution for all of the difficulties but its is a tool designed to assist leaders to think and act fast and smart. Bryson described a ten step process that will help out bring all the parts and actions together, also it will describe what activities and tasks will be needed to be taken to strengthen the strategic plan. The ten steps of the strategic planning process are pretty straight forward the first one is initiates and agrees upon a strategic planning process the second one is identifying organizational mandates, third one clarifies organizational mission and values fourth one, Assess the organization’s external and internal environments to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. The fifth one Identifies the strategic issues facing the organization, the sixth one formulates strategies to manage these issues, and the seventh one reviews and adopts the strategic plan or plans. The eighth step establishes an effective organizational vision; the night one develops an effective implementation process and the last step re-assess strategies and the strategic planning process. These ten steps lead to the actions, the good results and the evaluation the person should take, this three things should be added and proceed at each step in this process. Now I’m going to talk about each and one of the ten-step processes that are necessary to implement a strategic plan. The first step was initiating and agreeing on a strategic planning process, in which the purpose of this step is â€Å"to negotiate agreement among key internal and perhaps external decision makers or opinion leaders about the overall strategic planning effort and the key planning steps†, there they just support make decisions that will help the process to succeed. The Second step is where they are Identifying organizational mandates, there they are the â€Å"formal and informal mandates placed on an organization consist of the various ‘musts† that it confronts†. Third step that has to be fallowed is the clarifying Organizational mission and values; there the organization’s mission along with its mandates provides the social reason for its existence. The fourth step is where the Assessing the organizational external and internal environments, this one is pretty straight forward it where the team explores the environment outside and the team should also explore the inside of the organization as well to identify the strengths and weaknesses. Some of those threats cane be discovered with the monitoring a different number of political, economic, social, technological, educational and physical environmental forces and trends. The fifth step is identifying the strategic issues facing the organization and the first four steps is that makes the fifth one and what makes this step are three different elements and they are a concise description in one paragraph, the factors that make the issue a fundamental challenge which should be listed and the planning team in which should prepare a statement of the consequences of failing to address the issue. The sixth step has a five part process, this step is called the Formulating strategies and plans to manage the issues, which they find resources that define what an organization is. The five-part process starts with the identification of practical alternatives and dreams or visions for resolving the strategic issue. Then planning a team that has dreams and visions and then once the barriers are identified the planning makes a plane and then they take action and the last process is the feedback, which is closely monitored. The seventh step is the reviewing and adopting the strategies and plan, this s where the team need the approval to proceed with there work and once there approved it important to continue setting those goal and accomplishing them. Step eight is the establishing of an effective organizational vision, which this step here develops a description on how things should look like at the end is the â€Å"vision of success†. The ninth step is the developing an effective implementation process, the action plan take control and the final step the tenth one is the reassessing strategies and the strategic planning process in which they know that there are some strong things about this plan but at the same time there are some weaknesses that are noted. The strategy so this is that the change of cycle can make the governments think off what could go on and how they could improve in the weak spots. There are a lot of was that we can initiate and agree n a Strategic Planning Process. The first we need to take is by developing a main decision in which the leaders and initial will agree about the overall strategic planning effort and main planning step. Some of the accomplishments that could happen the organization that is controlled, overseen, or strongly influenced by the key decision makers interested in engaging in strategic planning, Introducing the concept of strategic planning, developing an understanding of its value, thinking of the implications of the process, developing a commitment to complete the work along with all reaching agreement this are some of the accomplishment there could be. But id things go a little wrong if the strategic planning process will affect the entire organization then the organization’s key decision makers need to be involved in the process. Then they will need to set up a policy group and an operational group with a individual to act as a go between the two groups which a high-ranking management person wouldn’t hurt. Something that the initial agreement should contain is the desired outcome expected from the strategic planning process. And also each committee and authority person should have a list of specific tasks that need to be completed along with a tentative time line for completion. The initiation of strategic planning involves three simple activities for many organizations: â€Å"gathering key actors, working through a strategic thinking and acting process, focusing on what is truly important while these activities may be conceptually simple, they can be quite difficult†. The clarifying of mandates and mission is pretty important because before an organization can define its mission and values and the requirement are the laws, ordinances, articles of incorporation in which they where given to the into the organization mission. There are three outcomes that we have to deal with and they are the identification of the organizations, interpretation of what is required and the clarifications of what is not ruled out by these mandates. The mission statement is the clarification of an organization and its purpose like what it should be doing or said differently, what it does and this mission is what states of the organization should do and if there doing what they said they where going to do. After that the benefits in which come in had is the discussions in the organization on what’s important, then the leadership is classified to the purpose of the organization and finally the agreement to help solve the arise organizations. The mission statement indicates the organizational purposes they are very long, but it is important to try to keep it as short as possible. Overall the mission is based on the organization and what it wanted to do but they have to stay in control meaning that they have laws, rules that they have t fallow. Here we will talk about the assessing of the environment to know the strengths and weaknesses. The purpose of the strategic planning process is to provide information on the organization’s strengths and weaknesses, and which they are usually internal and refer to the present state of the organization, while opportunities and threats are typically external and future orientated. The outcome of this plan is that we can build a specific action that could deal with the strengths and advantages of the opportunities. If any type of problem is going on with the organization they should consider institutionalizing periodic SWOT analyses. Over this entire step here is where the organizations need to show their strength and weaknesses in the external and internal environments. And the simpler the steps of the strategic planning are the better. There could also be some strategic issues that the organizations are facing for example the increase of federal demands to expand country programs they coast money, also the increase of ew environmental protection requirements in which are being imposed. There are a couple of ways we could approach the issue and they are direct approach, the indirect approach, the goal approach and the vision of success approach. Each one of them has a good thing and a bad one as well but over all the best one we could use and it’s the most helpful is the direct approach. The only bad thing about this approach is that it works best when there isn’t any type of agr eement on the goals of the organization. But one of the fist things you have to do is establish the goals and once they are set the work starts and that when work task is left alone with responsibility to complete the work on time. The success of the vision approach is helpful when there have been a couple of changes but the new changes need to be viewed by the organization to see if there actions are approved, and after each vision, goals is accomplished the vision is developed with a time line for the work. The indirect approach can be used when direction of the organization is not clear to anyone. The thing you got to do issue the approach developed to set options to keep the board happy. When fundamental challenges are identified the organization could be concerned of its mandates. The formulating and adopting of the strategies and plans to manage the issues is based developing the deal with strategic issues like they outline an organization response to the challenges each organization faces, and one way this issue could achieve it goal is if the vision of success approach is taken. There are four levels of and they are grans strategies, sub-unit strategies. , program of strategies and functional strategies. It purpose of strategy formulation and plan development is to make a link with the organization to its environment. The strategic plan has a very important deal with their form and content. Policies, programs, actions decisions all of thins things define what the organization is what it does and why is it that it does it, and that’s how strategies are define. The next thing that comes is that establishing an effective organizational vision for the future, while many of the public organizations Overall we know now that money isn’t really needed to take over strategic planning and this can help us with the public and any of the organizations so they could make their missions and serve there communities important things. And as you know that it could help you for filled the key stakeholder on there need to make sure there organization and community get what they need.

Reading the Book Making the Bible a Timeless Text

In Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text, its author, Burton L. Visotzky, presents to the reader a wonderful and exciting world of the midrash, one of the methods of interpreting the Hebrew Bible. Rabbis were the people who developed midrash in the land of Israel. Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Visotzky finds the Bible like an entity with numerous insights available to any reader who wants to understand the essence of the text. In this book, he focuses on different issues such as good and evil in a person, parent-child relations, sibling envy, life and death, faith, etc. In the chapters 8 (Dying) and 9 (Siblings), Visotzky discusses the issues of death, faith, essence of life, relations between relatives, and envy. In order to deepen the understanding of the text presented in Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Ti meless Text and in the Bible itself, it is necessary to clear up the differences between the Bible and midrash, using the ideas of Visotzky; to realize how exactly midrash may keep the text alive forever; and to discuss how Rabbis apply and elaborate the biblical story to their lives and the lives of their relatives using midrash and peshat in particular. To start the analysis of the book and the Bible, it is important to have a clear understanding of what midrash is and how it differs from the Bible. â€Å"Midrash is often compared to new literary analyses of the Bible because the rabbinic and the contemporary approaches to the Bible are said to bear some similarities, such as close attention to textual detail, and openness for multiple interpretations.† (Teugels 140) One of the peculiar features of midrash is that every word and even every comma in Torah has a reason. People truly believe that the Bible is written by God, so, such a text cannot have any punctuation or gram mar shortages. The Midrash is created by people, the Rabbis, so, someone may think that it is not that perfect as the Bible. The relation between the Bible and the Midrash may be compared with the relation between the present and the past. The text presented in the Midrash is a kind of interpretation of the text presented in the Bible from one concrete perspective presented by the Rabbis. This is what Visotzky tries to reproduce in his Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text. The Bible is the source text, and the Midrash is a kind of the target one interpreted by Jewish people. It is not the question of race and inequality, it is just one more attempt to present the biblical text from another perspective, a kind of renewal of the information taking into consideration cultural aspects, traditions, and time. So, the main difference between the Bible and midrash is that the later is a type of interpretation of the former that concentrates on small details, and this is what makes midrash unique and significant.Advertising Looking for essay on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More There is one more peculiar feature of midrash, it is its ability to keep the text alive. In Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text, Visotzky underlines that the text, the Torah, stays alive because of easy thematization prevention. In the Midrash, some alternative readings and interesting questions are offered. Midrash is not only a simple story to read, comprehend, and remember. The Bible is a holy text with its rules, and midrash helps to interpret it and opens the God’s voice to the reader. Midrash lifts all the voices out of the text and makes them somehow audible. Readers do not involve into simple reading only, they are also the participants of the conversation, conversation with God, other people, and oneself. Almost at the beginning of Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timele ss Text, Visotzky writes: â€Å"Every act of reading is a journey for which we carry baggage.† (Visotzky 5) So, with the help of midrash, readers get an opportunity to analyze their own sense of life, improve it, and even help the others make the necessary changes. For someone, the Bible is simple words, for someone, these words have unbelievable meaning that rules the life. Almost the same happens to the readers of the Midrash. People take all the information in midrash seriously and pay attention to each word and even comma, if they need and believe in all this. From the biblical perspective, the author touches upon such issue as sibling rivalry (in the chapter 9). It is not only about the envy between males and females (for example, in the Bible, the youngest brothers have been always in some kind of favor). However, the envy only between brothers or only between sisters is present indeed. This is what Visotzky describes in Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless T ext. One of the possible ways to understand clearly the reasons of such a rivalry between the relatives, especially between brothers and sisters, and the literary meaning of the text itself is the method of peshat. The author wonders: â€Å"Why should one prefer the midrash to the simple reading of the scriptural text, the peshat? (Visotzky 159). Peshat is one of the methods that Jewish people use to comprehend the Hebrew bible. The literal meaning of this method underlines the simplicity. In other words, peshat is a kind of exegesis that presents the meaning of the text with the help of simple and comprehensible expressions for any reader. The purpose of peshat is to retain a clear literal understanding of the Bible narrative. In the chapters 8 and 9 of Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text, the method that we call â€Å"peshat† or â€Å"pshat† helps to understand that the personalities presented in the Bible relate to ordinary people with their person al experience, their own dreams, and principles. The biblical narratives are captivating and unique indeed. They have such a quality to pull the reader and burn a desire to read more and more.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In general, with the help of the Rabbis interpretation of the biblical text, people get one more opportunity to comprehend the information presented in the Bible that gathered during such a long period of time. The New Testament and the Old Testament are not always comprehensible to every reader. If people take into consideration the variety of traditions, cultures, and time barrier, it will not be that easy to create one source that will be appropriate for any generation and any culture. The Midrash provides the readers with an opportunity to look at the familiar text in another light. The professor of int erreligious studies and midrash in particular, Burton L. Visotzky in his Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text explains to the readers the grounds of the Bible from the Rabbis perspective. Such explanation helps to analyze the information in a different way. This book turns out to be interesting and understandable to people of any race, belief, and people with any religious background. The interpretation offered by the Rabbis deepens our understanding in different ways: the readers realize that it is not that difficult to create and develop their own relationships grounding on the Bible, and present their own midrash. â€Å"Although midrash was mostly created by male rabbis, there is nothing to stop the modern writer and reader of the Bible from creating new midrash which re-examines texts that may be unfavorable and unsafe for women and re-fashions, re-interprets, and revises them.† (Graetz 19) The ideas of jealousy, parenting, rivalry between siblings, respons ibility, and faith presented in the book – this is exactly what rouses unbelievable interest in the readers’ mind. It helps to reveal a richness that the readers have not known or noticed before. A new vision of the already analyzed and discussed problems, new ideas and suggestions – this is what the reader can get from the book Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text by Visotzky. A clear understanding of the differences between the Bible, and one of its interpretations, midrash, the factors, which prove that midrash keep the holy text alive forever, and the analysis of the Bible with the help of one midrash methods, peshat, help to comprehend deeper not only the sense of the book by Visotzky, but also the essence of the Bible.Advertising Looking for essay on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Works Cited Graetz Naomi. Unlocking the Garden: A Feminist Jewish Look at the Bible, Midrash and God. Gorgias Press LLC, 2005. Teugels, Lieve, M. Bible and Midrash: the Story of â€Å"The Wooing of Rebekah†. Peeters Publisher, 2004. Visotzky, Burton, L. Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text. Random House, 1996. This essay on Reading the Book: Making the Bible a Timeless Text was written and submitted by user Galilea Livingston to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.