National Sovereignty, Oppressive Government, and the US Role in the Wor

National Sovereignty, Oppressive Government, and the US Role in the domain Introduction The American attack against Afghanistan that was triggered by the September 11th calamity once again raised the question of US role in the world. The current military machine intervention also touched the issue of the study factors, defining the course of US supranational policy. In the globalized world nowadays the ratio of soft power (the ability to attract through heathenish and ideological appeal) to hard power (a countrys economic and military ability to buy and coerce) determinationd in solving international encroachs is evermore increasing (Nye 2). However, military campaigns still provide a way bug out of deepening international crises. Should America, then, engage in indiscriminate humanitarian interventions, progress its ideas of democracy, human rights and liberty, or should it be militarily concerned single with international affairs that have a direct bearing on US snappy national interests? In my paper I argue that the US violation of a countrys sovereignty should come only after a careful consideration and deep investigation of the reasons lavatory an international conflict. Moreover, all interventions should be based on specific possible end-goals and strategies. Also, US military campaigns rationale should suit Americas vital national self-interest, as I define it later. Several reasons support such(prenominal) an international policy First, in the long run the negative effect of a military international intervention, even if against oppressive governments, could actually outdo the positive ones. Moreover, coercive policy could, in fact, aggravate a conflict by providing grounds for long lasting hostility, aggression, or ev... ...osnia and Kosovo. The Journal of Social, political and Economic Studies v. 25,( 2000) p. 489-510Nye, Joseph S. Jr., Redefining the National interest. Foreign Affairs, (July/August 1999) p. 22+Rule, J ames B., On evils abroad and Americas new world order. Dissent v. 46, no3 (1999) p. 50 57Smith, Tony, Morality and the use of force in a unipolar world the Wilsonian moment?. Eyhics and International Affairs v. 14, (2000) p. 11-22 http//www.cceia.org/lib_volume14.htmlTarzi, Shah M., The threat of the use of force in American post-cold war policy in the deuce-ace World. Journal of Third World Studies v. 18, no1, (2001) p. 39-64 The U.S. Nuclear Weapons Cost Study hold