The Same Sexe Mariage

The taper of this article is to have a coarse picture of the debating on the aforementioned(prenominal) hinge on wedding ceremony and the adoption of children by same sex-couples. In fact, this question makes a existing society debate in France. Nowadays, many another(prenominal) people think that the same- sex union is a good evolution of mentalities, and a big step in the French culture. Indeed, the wedding for everyone is an achievement to equality and piece rights. We emphasize that the marriage cannot be denied for devil people who love each other. It should wherefore not forget that marriage is solely a contract established by dickens people.And the situation in which the organisation is paradoxical because we should not forget that marriage for all concerns only a a couple of(prenominal) thousand people in France. It is a minority. The fact that a family will be unbalanced if there are two fathers or two mothers is really unfounded. Because in some situations, two fathers or two mothers best educate children than a immaculate couple. And it is quite possible that two brave parents are divided the roles in the pedagogics of a child. Finally on this point, if this enigma is a religious problem. It must not be forgotten that the state is alone independent of the church.So It has no involvement to say near what the state should do. To conclude, I think marriage for all Is a good thing because It shows that the society is able to evolve In the right direction. And this would Increase the gap among church and state, which would be beneficial for everyone. Because the church can get ideas to those who believe In It. But shall In no gaffe be put his own woof before everyone. Because for most people, the choices that the church Is fairish incomprehensible. By cons, It must be illustrious that the case of adoption for all Is motionless a thing that will feature time to be accepted, because It creates more problems.