'Indian Removal Act Essay\r'

'The Indian removal Act of 1830 was a het up topic in relative. Defend the transportation or rejection of the Act with reference to the moral, political, inbuilt and practical concerns of a congress homosexual.\r\nThe Indian remotion Act of 1830 was at the time, thought to be justified and acceptable. There were two groups, the peck who wanted the Indian’s gone, and the flock who believed they should be allowed to stay. I believe forcing the Indians bulge of their territory was immoral, had no effect on the state of Georgia, and it was an abuse of power.\r\nWhen the Indians were being take away from their territory, they were lead out at spot by our military. It’s immoral because in that respect were 17,000 Indians and 4,000 died due to dehydration, starvation, and disease. The Cherokee had rights given to them. â€Å"They were granted their know apart existence, as a political community, smooth possession and full enjoyment of their lands, inside certain boundaries, which are duly be and fully described and the protection of the fall in States against all in interference with, or encroachments upon, their rights, by any people, State, or nation,” argues a Maine Senator. The Indian Removal Act disregards any set of promises we have given to them. â€Å"What is the population of Georgia, where there is no room for these few Indians? It is less than seven to the square mile.\r\nWe, Sir, in Massachusetts, have seventy-four to the square mile, and home for a great many more,” states a Congressman. The occupation of Indians in Georgia had modest effect on the society or development of it. Georgia wanted to â€Å" unite their society” further they weren’t tone ending to strengthen their community by beef people out. professorship Andrew Jackson and President James Monroe, both(prenominal) were for the Indian Removal Act. President Jackson asks, â€Å"What good man would prefer a country cover with for ests and ranged by a few honey oil savages to our extensive republic?”\r\nThe Constitution of 1789 gave Congress the power to regulate commerce with overseas nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes. Yes, this is part of the Constitution, tho the abuse of power comes in here. We personnel them out of their territory that we occupied, with guns to their heads, no food, and the detachment of their families. I have always surmised that the Indian Removal Act was inhumane, unfair, and ill advised, but I never really knew wherefore I thought that. After class period about it, looking at both sides, it’s clearer. The Indian’s were forced out for a reason that had no effect on the states, and it was abusing the power that the unite States had been working for.\r\n'