Twelve Angry Men

Twelve Angry Men The jury in a trial is selected to examine certain facts and determine truth take a crap only upon the evidence presented to them in court. It is assumed that the jurors will value fairly and without any in the flesh(predicate) bias. In spite of this assertion people will be people and in reasonably cases, logic and emotion will collide. An excellent example that faces hardly what Im talking about is in the motion-picture show Twelve Angry Men. Twelve men who initially be strangers to each other have the fate of a youthful boy resting in the palm of their hands. In the beginning everyone is extend he is guilty except one who has one levelheaded doubt in his mind.

The single man on his profess was able to convince each of them by using logic to examine the testimony of each witness. After a a couple of(prenominal) hours of reasoning the jurors were eventually won over allowing the facts to dominate their individualized issues. During the arguments in the jury room the issues of race, age, social class, personal ...If you urgency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper